No. I said “your Musharraf”.Pls read again. Are you saying you are not a Mush supporter?

if Altaf is doing something why not others?

No. I did not say one did wrong so other did too. IMO Altaf has right to talk about homeland matters just like any other Pakistanis. I do not agree his self-exile drama but then this does not take away his liberty to talk about Pakistan’s issues.

never learned the lesson.

*nods* and I add that it’s Zardari turn now. He is not learning from others’ mistake but then he might not need to realize and his sole purpose of current job to grab as much as he can for his future generation.

But if the story continues in circles, there is no end point.

Well this is the cycle prescribed by God. We can’t do anything else. People who do not have fear of God and get ready to ruin other people will always suffer like that.

not in other countries.

As a citizen he can talks about it. If he does not hold Pakistani passport then yeah he should not.

The CJ being unbiased, time will tell.

I won’t surprise if the CJ gets biased. If he’s a true professional then he will not. BTW,a decision against Musharraf does not mean the court will be against him.

The reason to mention Mohajir factor is that most of urdu speaking people try to favor Musharraf due to his background which is not good thing at all.

p.s: I used to be a Mush supporter till 2003/4. Infact unlike many of his ardent followers I got chance to meet the guy in a ceremony back in 1999 in Karachi.

I mean, in case the italicized “azaad adliya” you wrote..means “so-called Azaad Adliya”

It may be that Musharraf has nothing convincing to say..It may be due to the biasedness of CJ..It may be due to both factors..

It may be that CJ has the “ME” factor..but keeps it suppressed..and decides unbiasedly considering all the factors..

So, if one knows the “true stories”, the actual things, intentions of CJ etc..and CAN call it Azaad Adliya in italics..with a SURETY, then he definitely should..but if one isn’t SURE..then he/she shouldn’t..:)

Or LOL, one may ask CJ directly kay please, bata dain, aap biased hain?

Hope he reveals the truth..:D

And just to make it clear a little. I did a bit of research in the recent events and the current issue is actually NOT a trial of Musharraf, which is the way it is being hyped by the media and government. Also, only the government can file for a high treason against him, which will also eventually result in the annulment on NRO and self-destruction for the current President.

You said..”time will tell” about the unbiasedness of CJ..

My question is, WHAT will make you certain about the unbiasedness (or biasedness) of CJ in this trial..(with time, as this trial proceeds and comes to a conclusion etc)?